All donations go towards web site maintenance for all of Technical Watch,
keep it free of charge, and may be tax deductable as an investment expense.

PayPal Verified
Join our market chat sessions every Tuesday and Thursday at 4:00 pm Pacific time!
More information on subscriber services can be found at

Sign up Calendar Latest Topics

  Author   Comment  

TW Patron++
Posts: 1,054
Reply with quote  #1 

Note: the Fed lquidity update is below this intial post from a few weeks ago.


As all are likely aware, the Federal Reserve has been normalizing the short term Fed Funds rate for over a year now, by raising the target rate from its emergency 1% level (the post 9-11 rate reduction exercise) to its current rate of 3.00%, likely 3.25% by the end of today.


The “measured” Fed funds target rate hikes do not necessarily smother liquidity injections into the financial system.  Where the Fed can affect liquidity, is via the level overnight lending rate, known as the effective (actual) rate, relative to the target rate (the rate that is going from 3.00% to 3.25% today).  The daily Fed effective rates can be found at this link:


It is generally the Fed overnight loan trading desk’s job to keep the effective rate charged member banks close the target rate.  When the effective rate is higher than the target rate, there appears to be a negative impact on the behavior of stock prices, i.e. stock prices have a tough time making upside progress.  Conversely, when the Fed overnight effective rate is less than the target rate, the path of least resistance for stock prices is usually to the upside.


This first chart measures the percentage deviation of the Fed effective rate (actual rate charged for short term loans) from the Fed funds target rate.  The daily data is then smoothed with a ten day simple moving average.  Note when the blue curve is below the zero line, denoting the effective rate has been higher than the target rate, stock prices move in a sideways pattern at best, and decline at worst.


However, when the overnight effective rate is less than the target rate, denoted by the blue curve spiking above zero or remaining above zero, stock prices tend to move higher. Note since the first of 2005, the blue curve has rarely exceeded the zero line, resulting in range bound stock prices. The same relationship too place in 2004, until the Fed overnight desk began lending funds at rates below the target rate.


Note the spikes above the zero line circled in green coincide with “easier money” at the first of each calendar year.




The New York Federal Reserve publishes daily, its temporary Open Market operations, and can be found at this link:


Member banks submit proposals to the New York Fed office for borrowing a specified sum of money at a specified interest rate. In turn, the Fed office accepts or rejects the member bank’s proposal submittals.  The next chart measures the percentage of submitted proposals (in billions of dollars) that are accepted by the New York Federal Reserve.  The daily percentage of accepted proposals is smoothed with a simple 10 day moving average (blue curve).  Note when the blue curve is below 25% for an extended period of time, stock prices have a difficult time appreciating in price.  The indicator has been below the 25% line for the past ten weeks, resulting in a range bound stock market, confirming the effective rate – target rate indicator.



In summary, the Federal Reserve does appear to have an influence upon stock prices.  Periodic and robust infusions of liquidity into the financial system, seems to provide the stock market the “kick” it needs to move higher.  Since both of these Fed liquidity infusion measures have been in negative territory for two to three months, and with the impact of oil prices on the economy, hopefully the Fed will loosen up on the liquidity reins allowing stock prices the opportunity to move out of their recent range.






TW Patron++
Posts: 1,054
Reply with quote  #2 

The Fed has changed its tune of late with respect to opening up the liquidity spigot.  This chart is an update of the initial Fed target-Fed effective chart above, posted a few weeks ago.


Shortly after the Fed's target rate increase to 3.25%, the overnight effective rate has been below the 3.25% target rate more often than not, allowing the blue curve in the following chart to decisively exceed the zero line for the first time in quite awhile, now at the same level as at the first of this year.  The Fed has a tendency of relaxing their effective rate around the first of each calendar year, but those liquidity injections usually do not have significant impact on stock prices.


More often than not, when the blue curve indicator finds its way above the zero line to its current level, some of the excess liquidity finds its way into stocks, resulting in higher prices.



What is relatively rare, are times when both the target-effective rate indicator and the below indicator (blue curve) are both in territory signaling positive Fed liquidity infusions at the same time.


The 10 day MA of the percentage of submitted proposals accepted by the Fed has exceeded the 25% line, signaling the Fed is more accommodating to its member banks' requests for temporary loans.  This indicator confirms the Fed is being far more generous with the liquidity spigot than it has been over the past few months




Since the 2003 bull market began, there have been three distinctive time frames when both of these Fed liquidity measures have both been in the "easy money" zone at the same time:


1) March 2003


2) August/September 2003


3) August/September 2004


During those time frames of Fed liquidity pumping, stock prices did pretty well for the following few months.  It will be interesting to observe if the Fed's liquidity policies over the past couple of weeks will have a similar impact of equity prices going into the fall.




Posts: 5,091
Reply with quote  #3 
Thanks for the update.


Dave's LinkedIn Profile

Technical Watch Twitter Page

Technical Watch Facebook Page

"As for it being different this time, it is different every time. The question is in what way, and to what extent" - Tom McClellan

"An economist is someone who sees something happen, and then wonders if it would work in theory" - Ronald Reagan

"What we see depends mainly on what we look for" - John Lubbock

"The eye sees only what the mind is ready to comprehend" - Henri Bergson

“Answers are easy; it’s asking the right questions which is hard” - Dr. Who - 1977

"You know the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common - they don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views (which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering)" - Dr. Who - 1977

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

Copyright 2000-2020 Technical Watch